This year Russia won the 66th place in the ranking of human development, while last year the country was at 65 positions, according to the twenty-first in a row, "Human Development Report" of the United Nations. Perhaps a similar reduction in the rating of the crisis has affected the domestic economy.Nevertheless, the human development index increases with age, for example, in 2005 the figure was 0.725 Russia, at the present time, it rose to 0.755, according to the dynamics of the HDI. In the report there is an assumption that the growth index is often associated with the environmental condition of the country. In general, the HDI takes into account such factors as the average achievements of the country's three main criteria: health and longevity, knowledge and decent living conditions. It is calculated and published in the report since 1990, inclusive.The main indicators of Russia is the average life expectancy at birth - 68.8 years, mean duration of education - 9.8 years, the average expectancy of education - 14.1 years, the gross national income (GNI) per capita - 14,561 dollars a year.As reported in a study on indicators of Russia negatively affect social inequality, environmental problems, besides low life expectancy, more typical of disadvantaged countries. Just because the last factor, surprising was the fact that Russia surpassed countries such as Cuba and Libya, where life expectancy is higher than in our country.
Ranking of countries by Human Development InNumber Countries Human Development Index (HDI)1 Norway 0.9432 Australia 0.9293 Netherlands 0.9104 U.S. 0.9105 New Zealand 0.9086 Canada 0.9087 Ireland 0.9088 Lichtenstein 0,9059 Germany 0,90510 Sweden 0.904To download the entire table, click on her arm
In addition, experts note that in Russia and other countries that export oil and gas in the former Soviet Union, made a very strong emphasis on the use of natural resources, not to diversify the economy, which could seriously affect the stability and the stability of human development in the coming years. It should be noted that Russia, however, is ahead in the ranking of its neighbors in the BRIC countries. Among the largest states with the fastest growing economies in Brazil takes place in the ranking of 84, China - 101 places, and India - 134 place.This year, with Russia, Belarus and adjacent to Grenada. Belarus is the highest rating among the CIS countries, and among former Soviet countries of Belarus ahead of Russia and the Baltic countries that were able to enter into the first group of countries with very high levels of human development: Estonia (in the ranking is 34th), Lithuania (in the ranking 40th), Latvia (in the ranking is 43rd place). Along with Russia, there are such states of the former Soviet Union such as Kazakhstan (in the ranking is 68th), Georgia (in the ranking is 75th place), Ukraine (in the ranking is 76th place). Other post-Soviet states included in the group of countries with medium level of development: Turkmenistan (102 in the ranking takes place), Moldova (in the ranking is 111 nd place - the lowest in Europe).Norway is recognized as the most prosperous country in the world this year.Recall that from 2001 to 2006 headed the Scandinavian country this rating, then was shifted to second place by Iceland, but in 2008 returned to Norway leadership.The level of life expectancy in Norway is among the highest in the world - 81.1 years, average annual per capita income - 57 130 dollars. Also, the country's low inflation and unemployment, but it is called Norway and one of the most expensive countries.In five of the most prosperous countries included Australia, the Netherlands, the United States and New Zealand. The last in the ranking were Burundi, Niger and Congo. These countries are characterized by low life expectancy - from 40 to 50 years, unfavorable socio-economic environment, low literacy rate of the population - can read and write no more than 30% of all residents, and per capita income of less than 1000 dollars per person per year. In some countries, these figures are compounded by the devastating effects of armed conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment